(no subject)

[fatih_irevanli]

Forty years after Kenyan independence from Britain, the words "Mau Mau" still conjure images of crazed savages hacking up hapless white settlers with machetes. The British Colonial Office, struggling to preserve its far-flung empire of dependencies after World War II, spread hysteria about Kenya's Mau Mau independence movement by depicting its supporters among the Kikuyu people as irrational terrorists and monsters. Caroline Elkins, a historian at Harvard University, has done a masterful job setting the record straight in her epic investigation, Imperial Reckoning. After years of research in London and Kenya, including interviews with hundreds of Kenyans, settlers, and former British officials, Elkins has written the first book about the eight-year British war against the Mau Mau.

She concludes that the war, one of the bloodiest and most protracted decolonization struggles of the past century, was anything but the "civilizing mission" portrayed by British propagandists and settlers. Instead, Britain engaged in an amazingly brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing that seemed to border on outright genocide. While only 32 white settlers were killed by Mau Mau insurgents, Elkins reports that tens of thousands of Kenyans were slaughtered, perhaps up to 300,000. The British also interned the entire 1.5 million population of Kikuyu, the colony's largest ethnic group, in barbed-wire villages, forced-labour reserves where famine and disease ran rampant, and prison camps that Elkins describes as the Kenyan "Gulag." The Kikuyu were subjected to unimaginable torture, or "screening," as British officials called it, which included being whipped, beaten, sodomized, castrated, burned, and forced to eat feces and drink urine. British officials later destroyed almost all official records of the campaign. Elkins infuses her account with the riveting stories of individual Kikuyu detainees, settlers, British officials, and soldiers. This is a stunning narrative that finally sheds light on a misunderstood war for which no one has yet been held officially accountable.

Это та самая Британия, которая считает себя вправе признавать надуманный "геноцид армян". И происходит всё не в смутные времена первой мировой, а в середине ХХ века, в мире ВВС, CNN и Сеймура Херша.

Двуличные суки.

Comments

[toral-pavlos.livejournal.com]

нет логики.
что мешает убийце признать что его соседку изнасиловали?
так, образно выражаясь.

[fatih-irevanli.livejournal.com]

Тут скорее кто громче кричит "Вор, вор!".

[pokladun.livejournal.com]

надо бы поучиться у них этой двуличности... знаем тока как своих же наебывать...

[k00ler1984.livejournal.com]

Уж не на англичан ли намекал Брайза говоря, что "Ни моротворцы стран-сопредседателей, ни соседних государств не могут быть размещены в Карабахе"?

[fatih-irevanli.livejournal.com]

Да ну нах.

Они принцев не напасутся на наши буйства.

принцев мало, но есть гуркхи...

[k00ler1984.livejournal.com]

а бипишный нефтепровод охранять на случай буйств кому как не им?